Skip to content
Founderz: Responsible Use of AI home

in collaboration with Microsoft

The ten principles

Principle 05 · While you work · Critical thinking

Independent judgment and skills

People form their own view before relying on AI, and keep practicing the skills their work depends on.

Key question

What do I think?

Benefit

People improve at their work while AI makes them faster at it.

Context

AI can make you faster. Whether it also makes you better depends on how you use it. A survey of 319 knowledge workers by Carnegie Mellon University and Microsoft Research found that the more people trusted AI with a task, the less critical thinking they reported, while people confident in their own ability reported more.

Put your own thinking first. Write three lines of your own answer before you ask, then compare them with the AI’s and note what you learn.

Skill retention

Skills can fade when a machine does the work. Aviation met this years ago: in 2013 the US Federal Aviation Administration encouraged airlines to promote manual flying when appropriate, because continuous use of automation doesn’t keep manual skills sharp.

Medicine is seeing a version of it. At four Polish endoscopy centers, doctors’ detection rate in colonoscopies done without AI fell from 28.4% to 22.4% in the months after AI assistance arrived. It’s one observational study, and its authors’ university calls the result hypothesis-generating. Treat it as a warning, and do the core of your job yourself from time to time.

Tasks where AI helps

Responsible use includes using AI where it helps. When 20,000 UK civil servants tried an AI assistant in their office software, they reported saving 26 minutes a day on average, and 82% didn’t want to go back. A smaller evaluation in one department found faster, better report summaries and slower, less accurate spreadsheet analysis. Try AI on your real tasks, keep what works and measure it. The case study has the detail.

Practices

  1. 01Write your own answer or outline first, even three lines, then compare.
  2. 02Ask AI to explain its answer and to quiz you, as well as to do the work.
  3. 03Do the core of your job without AI from time to time.
  4. 04Notice when you’re accepting answers you couldn’t judge on your own, and learn enough to judge them.
  5. 05Use AI where it earns its place. Some tasks are quicker, cheaper or better done without it.

Prompt examples

A prompt before and after improvement, and the part a person does outside the prompt.

Decisions and plans

Setting a price

Before

“What price should we set for the new product?”

After

“I think €49 a month is right because [your reasoning], based on this data [data]. Where is my reasoning weakest, and what am I missing?”

Your part

Decide, and write down anything that changed your mind.

Why it works: Starting from your own view turns AI into a sparring partner and keeps the judgment yours.

Learning

Learning a spreadsheet skill

Before

“Build the pivot table analysis for me.”

After

“Walk me through building a pivot table of sales by region and month, one step at a time. After each step, ask me what I expect to see before you show the result.”

Your part

Do the steps yourself in your own spreadsheet. Next time, try it without help first.

Why it works: Predicting each result before you see it helps the skill stick.

Writing

Drafting a strategy note

Before

“Write our Q1 marketing strategy.”

After

“Here is my outline for our Q1 marketing strategy: three priorities and why. Challenge each priority, suggest what’s missing and point out where I’m vague.”

Your part

Keep the strategy yours. Use the challenges to sharpen it, and write the final version yourself.

Why it works: You end up with your own strategy, tested before anyone else sees it.

Evidence

  • In a survey of 319 knowledge workers, higher confidence in generative AI was associated with less reported critical thinking, and higher self-confidence with more. [Lee et al., CHI 2025]
  • In colonoscopies done without AI, the adenoma detection rate at four centers fell from 28.4% to 22.4% after AI assistance was introduced. [Budzyń et al., Lancet G&H]
  • The US Federal Aviation Administration encourages airlines to promote manual flying when appropriate, to keep skills that automation doesn’t exercise. [FAA]
  • Under the EU AI Act, organizations that provide or use AI systems must take measures to support their staff’s AI literacy. [AI Omnibus]
  • UK civil servants reported saving an average of 26 minutes a day with an AI assistant, and a departmental evaluation found the gains varied by task. [GDS] [DBT]

Case studies and scenarios

Team practice

Protect time for people to practice core skills, and pair junior colleagues’ AI-assisted work with a short review conversation: what did you ask, what did you change and what would you do differently?

Team toolTeam AI charter

Sources

What each source establishes, and its limits. The practices and recommendations on this page are ours, and the facts come from the sources. See every source we use.

  1. The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers Carnegie Mellon University and Microsoft Research (CHI 2025) · April 25, 2025 · Peer-reviewed research In a survey of 319 knowledge workers sharing 936 examples, higher confidence in generative AI was associated with less reported critical thinking, and higher self-confidence with more. Limits: Self-reported and cross-sectional: it shows an association, not measured skill loss.
  2. Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · August 12, 2025 · Peer-reviewed research At four centers, the adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies done without AI fell from 28.4% to 22.4% after AI assistance was introduced. Limits: Observational before-and-after design, described by the authors’ university as hypothesis-generating. A correction was published in September 2025.
  3. Safety Alert for Operators 13002: Manual Flight Operations US Federal Aviation Administration · January 4, 2013 · Safety advisory Encourages airlines to promote manual flying when appropriate, because continuous use of automation doesn’t reinforce manual flying skills. Limits: Advisory, for US air carriers. We use it as an analogy.
  4. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (AI Omnibus) European Union, Official Journal · Adopted July 8, 2026; in force July 27, 2026 · Law Amends the AI Act: keeps the AI literacy duty of providers and deployers without a guaranteed level, moves high-risk dates to December 2, 2027 (Annex III), and August 2, 2028 (Annex I), gives generative systems already on the market until December 2, 2026, to mark synthetic content, and adds bans on non-consensual intimate deepfakes and child sexual abuse material from December 2, 2026. Limits: An amending act. Read it with the consolidated text of the AI Act.
  5. Microsoft 365 Copilot Experiment: Cross-Government Findings Report UK Government Digital Service · June 2, 2025 · Government evaluation 20,000 civil servants used the assistant from October to December 2024 and reported an average saving of 26 minutes a day; 82% wouldn’t want to go back. The tool was weaker on complex or nuanced work, and human oversight was needed at all times. Limits: Time savings are self-reported, from 7,115 survey responses, with no control group.
  6. Microsoft 365 Copilot pilot: DBT evaluation report UK Department for Business and Trade · August 28, 2025 · Government evaluation 72% of users were satisfied. In observed tasks, report summaries were faster and better, while spreadsheet analysis was slower and less accurate. It found no evidence that time saved raised productivity. Limits: A 32% response rate, small observed samples and no before-and-after baseline.

Cite this page

Founderz (2026). Principle 5: Independent judgment and skills. The RUAI Standard, 2026 edition. Developed by Founderz in collaboration with Microsoft. https://responsibleai.founderz.com/toolkit/principles/independent-judgment

Licensed under CC BY 4.0: share and adapt with attribution.